Publications by Daniel Zoller

2021 [ nach oben ]

1.
Fischer, E., Zoller, D., Hotho, A.: Comparison of Transformer-Based Sequential Product Recommendation Models for the Coveo Data Challenge. SIGIR Workshop On eCommerce. (2021).
[ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
@article{fischer2021comparison, author = {Fischer, Elisabeth and Zoller, Daniel and Hotho, Andreas}, journal = {SIGIR Workshop On eCommerce}, keywords = {myown comparison product Coveo data challenge recommendation transformer}, month = {July}, title = {Comparison of Transformer-Based Sequential Product Recommendation Models for the Coveo Data Challenge}, year = 2021 }

2020 [ nach oben ]

1.
Fischer, E., Zoller, D., Dallmann, A., Hotho, A.: Integrating Keywords into BERT4Rec for Sequential Recommendation. KI 2020: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (2020).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
A crucial part of recommender systems is to model the user’s preference based on her previous interactions. Different neural networks (e.g., Recurrent Neural Networks), that predict the next item solely based on the sequence of interactions have been successfully applied to sequential recommendation. Recently, BERT4Rec has been proposed, which adapts the BERT architecture based on the Transformer model and training methods used in the Neural Language Modeling community to this task. However, BERT4Rec still only relies on item identifiers to model the user preference, ignoring other sources of information. Therefore, as a first step to include additional information, we propose KeBERT4Rec, a modification of BERT4Rec, which utilizes keyword descriptions of items. We compare two variants for adding keywords to the model on two datasets, a Movielens dataset and a dataset of an online fashion store. First results show that both versions of our model improves the sequential recommending task compared to BERT4Rec.
@inproceedings{fischer2020integrating, abstract = {A crucial part of recommender systems is to model the user’s preference based on her previous interactions. Different neural networks (e.g., Recurrent Neural Networks), that predict the next item solely based on the sequence of interactions have been successfully applied to sequential recommendation. Recently, BERT4Rec has been proposed, which adapts the BERT architecture based on the Transformer model and training methods used in the Neural Language Modeling community to this task. However, BERT4Rec still only relies on item identifiers to model the user preference, ignoring other sources of information. Therefore, as a first step to include additional information, we propose KeBERT4Rec, a modification of BERT4Rec, which utilizes keyword descriptions of items. We compare two variants for adding keywords to the model on two datasets, a Movielens dataset and a dataset of an online fashion store. First results show that both versions of our model improves the sequential recommending task compared to BERT4Rec.}, author = {Fischer, Elisabeth and Zoller, Daniel and Dallmann, Alexander and Hotho, Andreas}, booktitle = {KI 2020: Advances in Artificial Intelligence}, keywords = {myown kebert4rec sequential recommendation embedding bert4rec keyword selected}, title = {Integrating Keywords into BERT4Rec for Sequential Recommendation}, year = 2020 }

2017 [ nach oben ]

1.
Zoller, D., Doerfel, S., Pölitz, C., Hotho, A.: Leveraging User-Interactions for Time-Aware Tag Recommendations. Proceedings of the Workshop on Temporal Reasoning in Recommender Systems (2017).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
For the popular task of tag recommendation, various (complex) approaches have been proposed. Recently however, research has focused on heuristics with low computational effort and particularly, a time-aware heuristic, called BLL, has been shown to compare well to various state-of-the-art methods. Here, we follow up on these results by presenting another time-aware approach leveraging user interaction data in an easily interpretable, on-the-fly computable approach that can successfully be combined with BLL. We investigate the influence of time as a parameter in that approach, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method using two datasets from the popular public social tagging system BibSonomy.
@inproceedings{zoller2017leveraging, abstract = {For the popular task of tag recommendation, various (complex) approaches have been proposed. Recently however, research has focused on heuristics with low computational effort and particularly, a time-aware heuristic, called BLL, has been shown to compare well to various state-of-the-art methods. Here, we follow up on these results by presenting another time-aware approach leveraging user interaction data in an easily interpretable, on-the-fly computable approach that can successfully be combined with BLL. We investigate the influence of time as a parameter in that approach, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method using two datasets from the popular public social tagging system BibSonomy.}, author = {Zoller, Daniel and Doerfel, Stephan and Pölitz, Christian and Hotho, Andreas}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Temporal Reasoning in Recommender Systems}, keywords = {myown recommendation tag interaction user selected}, series = {{CEUR} Workshop Proceedings}, title = {Leveraging User-Interactions for Time-Aware Tag Recommendations}, year = 2017 }

2016 [ nach oben ]

1.
Niebler, T., Becker, M., Zoller, D., Doerfel, S., Hotho, A.: FolkTrails: Interpreting Navigation Behavior in a Social Tagging System. Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
Social tagging systems have established themselves as a quick and easy way to organize information by annotating resources with tags. In recent work, user behavior in social tagging systems was studied, that is, how users assign tags, and consume content. However, it is still unclear how users make use of the navigation options they are given. Understanding their behavior and differences in behavior of different user groups is an important step towards assessing the effectiveness of a navigational concept and of improving it to better suit the users’ needs. In this work, we investigate navigation trails in the popular scholarly social tagging system BibSonomy from six years of log data. We discuss dynamic browsing behavior of the general user population and show that different navigational subgroups exhibit different navigational traits. Furthermore, we provide strong evidence that the semantic nature of the underlying folksonomy is an essential factor for explaining navigation.
@inproceedings{niebler2016folktrails, abstract = {Social tagging systems have established themselves as a quick and easy way to organize information by annotating resources with tags. In recent work, user behavior in social tagging systems was studied, that is, how users assign tags, and consume content. However, it is still unclear how users make use of the navigation options they are given. Understanding their behavior and differences in behavior of different user groups is an important step towards assessing the effectiveness of a navigational concept and of improving it to better suit the users’ needs. In this work, we investigate navigation trails in the popular scholarly social tagging system BibSonomy from six years of log data. We discuss dynamic browsing behavior of the general user population and show that different navigational subgroups exhibit different navigational traits. Furthermore, we provide strong evidence that the semantic nature of the underlying folksonomy is an essential factor for explaining navigation.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Niebler, Thomas and Becker, Martin and Zoller, Daniel and Doerfel, Stephan and Hotho, Andreas}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management}, keywords = {tagging hyptrails myown system social navigation folktrails bibsonomy behavior}, publisher = {ACM}, series = {CIKM '16}, title = {FolkTrails: Interpreting Navigation Behavior in a Social Tagging System}, year = 2016 }

2.
Zoller, D., Doerfel, S., Jäschke, R., Stumme, G., Hotho, A.: Posted, Visited, Exported: Altmetrics in the Social Tagging System BibSonomy. Journal of Informetrics. 10, 732–749 (2016).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
In social tagging systems, like Mendeley, CiteULike, and BibSonomy, users can post, tag, visit, or export scholarly publications. In this paper, we compare citations with metrics derived from users’ activities (altmetrics) in the popular social bookmarking system BibSonomy. Our analysis, using a corpus of more than 250,000 publications published before 2010, reveals that overall, citations and altmetrics in BibSonomy are mildly correlated. Furthermore, grouping publications by user-generated tags results in topic-homogeneous subsets that exhibit higher correlations with citations than the full corpus. We find that posts, exports, and visits of publications are correlated with citations and even bear predictive power over future impact. Machine learning classifiers predict whether the number of citations that a publication receives in a year exceeds the median number of citations in that year, based on the usage counts of the preceding year. In that setup, a Random Forest predictor outperforms the baseline on average by seven percentage points.
@article{zoller2016posted, abstract = {In social tagging systems, like Mendeley, CiteULike, and BibSonomy, users can post, tag, visit, or export scholarly publications. In this paper, we compare citations with metrics derived from users’ activities (altmetrics) in the popular social bookmarking system BibSonomy. Our analysis, using a corpus of more than 250,000 publications published before 2010, reveals that overall, citations and altmetrics in BibSonomy are mildly correlated. Furthermore, grouping publications by user-generated tags results in topic-homogeneous subsets that exhibit higher correlations with citations than the full corpus. We find that posts, exports, and visits of publications are correlated with citations and even bear predictive power over future impact. Machine learning classifiers predict whether the number of citations that a publication receives in a year exceeds the median number of citations in that year, based on the usage counts of the preceding year. In that setup, a Random Forest predictor outperforms the baseline on average by seven percentage points.}, author = {Zoller, Daniel and Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert and Stumme, Gerd and Hotho, Andreas}, journal = {Journal of Informetrics}, keywords = {tagging myown log social for:dmir altmetrics analysis selected}, number = 3, pages = {732–749}, title = {Posted, Visited, Exported: Altmetrics in the Social Tagging System BibSonomy}, volume = 10, year = 2016 }

3.
Doerfel, S., Zoller, D., Singer, P., Niebler, T., Hotho, A., Strohmaier, M.: What Users Actually do in a Social Tagging System: A Study of User Behavior in BibSonomy. ACM Transactions on the Web. 10, 14:1–14:32 (2016).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in today’s web and have attracted the interest of our research community in a variety of investigations. Henceforth, several aspects of social tagging systems have been discussed and assumptions have emerged on which our community builds their work. Yet, testing such assumptions has been difficult due to the absence of suitable usage data in the past. In this work, we thoroughly investigate and evaluate four aspects about tagging systems, covering social interaction, retrieval of posted resources, the importance of the three different types of entities, users, resources, and tags, as well as connections between these entities’ popularity in posted and in requested content. For that purpose, we examine live server log data gathered from the real-world, public social tagging system BibSonomy. Our empirical results paint a mixed picture about the four aspects. While for some, typical assumptions hold to a certain extent, other aspects need to be reflected in a very critical light. Our observations have implications for the understanding of social tagging systems, and the way they are used on the web. We make the dataset used in this work available to other researchers.
@article{doerfel2016users, abstract = {Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in today’s web and have attracted the interest of our research community in a variety of investigations. Henceforth, several aspects of social tagging systems have been discussed and assumptions have emerged on which our community builds their work. Yet, testing such assumptions has been difficult due to the absence of suitable usage data in the past. In this work, we thoroughly investigate and evaluate four aspects about tagging systems, covering social interaction, retrieval of posted resources, the importance of the three different types of entities, users, resources, and tags, as well as connections between these entities’ popularity in posted and in requested content. For that purpose, we examine live server log data gathered from the real-world, public social tagging system BibSonomy. Our empirical results paint a mixed picture about the four aspects. While for some, typical assumptions hold to a certain extent, other aspects need to be reflected in a very critical light. Our observations have implications for the understanding of social tagging systems, and the way they are used on the web. We make the dataset used in this work available to other researchers.}, author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus}, journal = {ACM Transactions on the Web}, keywords = {tagging myown system study for:dmir user bibsonomy behavior selected}, number = 2, pages = {14:1–14:32}, title = {What Users Actually do in a Social Tagging System: A Study of User Behavior in BibSonomy}, volume = 10, year = 2016 }

2015 [ nach oben ]

1.
Dallmann, A., Lemmerich, F., Zoller, D., Hotho, A.: Media Bias in German Online Newspapers. In: Bergmann, R., Görg, S., and Müller, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the LWA 2015 Workshops: KDML, FGWM, IR, and FGDB. Trier, Germany, 7.-9. October 2015. CEUR-WS.org (2015).
[ BibTeX ] [ URL ] [ Download ]
 
@inproceedings{dallmann2015media, author = {Dallmann, Alexander and Lemmerich, Florian and Zoller, Daniel and Hotho, Andreas}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the LWA 2015 Workshops: KDML, FGWM, IR, and FGDB. Trier, Germany, 7.-9. October 2015}, editor = {Bergmann, R. and Görg, S. and Müller, G.}, keywords = {newspaper myown german lwa bias online abstract media}, publisher = {CEUR-WS.org}, series = {{CEUR} Workshop Proceedings}, title = {Media Bias in German Online Newspapers}, year = 2015 }

2.
Dallmann, A., Lemmerich, F., Zoller, D., Hotho, A.: Media Bias in German Online Newspapers. 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM, Cyprus, Turkey, September 1-4 (2015).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
Online newspapers have been established as a crucial information source, at least partially replacing traditional media like television or print media. As all other media, online newspapers are potentially affected by media bias.This describes non-neutral reporting of journalists and other news producers, e.g. with respect to specific opinions or political parties. Analysis of media bias has a long tradition in political science. However, traditional techniques rely heavily on manual annotation and are thus often limited to the analysis of small sets of articles. In this paper, we investigate a dataset that covers all political and economical news from four leading German online newspapers over a timespan of four years. In order to analyze this large document set and compare the political orientation of different newspapers, we propose a variety of automatically computable measures that can indicate media bias. As a result, statistically significant differences in the reporting about specific parties can be detected between the analyzed online newspapers.
@inproceedings{dallmann2015media, abstract = {Online newspapers have been established as a crucial information source, at least partially replacing traditional media like television or print media. As all other media, online newspapers are potentially affected by media bias.This describes non-neutral reporting of journalists and other news producers, e.g. with respect to specific opinions or political parties. Analysis of media bias has a long tradition in political science. However, traditional techniques rely heavily on manual annotation and are thus often limited to the analysis of small sets of articles. In this paper, we investigate a dataset that covers all political and economical news from four leading German online newspapers over a timespan of four years. In order to analyze this large document set and compare the political orientation of different newspapers, we propose a variety of automatically computable measures that can indicate media bias. As a result, statistically significant differences in the reporting about specific parties can be detected between the analyzed online newspapers.}, address = {Cyprus, Turkey, September 1-4}, author = {Dallmann, Alexander and Lemmerich, Florian and Zoller, Daniel and Hotho, Andreas}, booktitle = {26th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media}, keywords = {newspaper myown german bias}, publisher = {ACM}, title = {Media Bias in German Online Newspapers}, year = 2015 }

3.
v. Kistowski, J., Nikolas, H., Zoller, D., Kounev, S., Hotho, A.: Modeling and Extracting Load Intensity Profiles. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS) (2015).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
Today’s system developers and operators face the challenge of creating software systems that make efficient use of dynamically allocated resources under highly variable and dynamic load profiles, while at the same time delivering reliable performance. Benchmarking of systems under these constraints is difficult, as state-of-the-art benchmarking frameworks provide only limited support for emulating such dynamic and highly vari- able load profiles for the creation of realistic workload scenarios. Industrial benchmarks typically confine themselves to workloads with constant or stepwise increasing loads. Alternatively, they support replaying of recorded load traces. Statistical load inten- sity descriptions also do not sufficiently capture concrete pattern load profile variations over time. To address these issues, we present the Descartes Load Intensity Model (DLIM). DLIM provides a modeling formalism for describing load intensity variations over time. A DLIM instance can be used as a compact representation of a recorded load intensity trace, providing a powerful tool for benchmarking and performance analysis. As manually obtaining DLIM instances can be time consuming, we present three different automated extraction methods, which also help to enable autonomous system analysis for self-adaptive systems. Model expressiveness is validated using the presented extraction methods. Extracted DLIM instances exhibit a median modeling error of 12.4% on average over nine different real-world traces covering between two weeks and seven months. Additionally, extraction methods perform orders of magnitude faster than existing time series decomposition approaches.
@inproceedings{vkistowski2015toappearmodeling, abstract = {Today’s system developers and operators face the challenge of creating software systems that make efficient use of dynamically allocated resources under highly variable and dynamic load profiles, while at the same time delivering reliable performance. Benchmarking of systems under these constraints is difficult, as state-of-the-art benchmarking frameworks provide only limited support for emulating such dynamic and highly vari- able load profiles for the creation of realistic workload scenarios. Industrial benchmarks typically confine themselves to workloads with constant or stepwise increasing loads. Alternatively, they support replaying of recorded load traces. Statistical load inten- sity descriptions also do not sufficiently capture concrete pattern load profile variations over time. To address these issues, we present the Descartes Load Intensity Model (DLIM). DLIM provides a modeling formalism for describing load intensity variations over time. A DLIM instance can be used as a compact representation of a recorded load intensity trace, providing a powerful tool for benchmarking and performance analysis. As manually obtaining DLIM instances can be time consuming, we present three different automated extraction methods, which also help to enable autonomous system analysis for self-adaptive systems. Model expressiveness is validated using the presented extraction methods. Extracted DLIM instances exhibit a median modeling error of 12.4% on average over nine different real-world traces covering between two weeks and seven months. Additionally, extraction methods perform orders of magnitude faster than existing time series decomposition approaches.}, author = {v. Kistowski, Jóakim and Nikolas, Herbst. and Zoller, Daniel and Kounev, Samuel and Hotho, Andreas}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS)}, keywords = {intensity myown modeling profile load extracting}, title = {Modeling and Extracting Load Intensity Profiles}, year = 2015 }

4.
Zoller, D., Doerfel, S., Jäschke, R., Stumme, G., Hotho, A.: On Publication Usage in a Social Bookmarking System. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Web Science (2015).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
Scholarly success is traditionally measured in terms of citations to publications. With the advent of publication man- agement and digital libraries on the web, scholarly usage data has become a target of investigation and new impact metrics computed on such usage data have been proposed – so called altmetrics. In scholarly social bookmarking sys- tems, scientists collect and manage publication meta data and thus reveal their interest in these publications. In this work, we investigate connections between usage metrics and citations, and find posts, exports, and page views of publications to be correlated to citations.
@inproceedings{zoller2015publication, abstract = {Scholarly success is traditionally measured in terms of citations to publications. With the advent of publication man- agement and digital libraries on the web, scholarly usage data has become a target of investigation and new impact metrics computed on such usage data have been proposed – so called altmetrics. In scholarly social bookmarking sys- tems, scientists collect and manage publication meta data and thus reveal their interest in these publications. In this work, we investigate connections between usage metrics and citations, and find posts, exports, and page views of publications to be correlated to citations.}, author = {Zoller, Daniel and Doerfel, Stephan and Jäschke, Robert and Stumme, Gerd and Hotho, Andreas}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Web Science}, keywords = {publication myown social impact usage short:zoller2015publusage altmetrics bookmarking}, title = {On Publication Usage in a Social Bookmarking System}, year = 2015 }

2014 [ nach oben ]

1.
Doerfel, S., Zoller, D., Singer, P., Niebler, T., Hotho, A., Strohmaier, M.: Evaluating Assumptions about Social Tagging - A Study of User Behavior in BibSonomy. In: Seidl, T., Hassani, M., and Beecks, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th LWA Workshops: KDML, IR and FGWM, Aachen, Germany, September 8-10, 2014. pp. 18–19. CEUR-WS.org (2014).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ Download ]
 
Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in today’s web and have attracted the interest of our research community in a variety of investigations. Henceforth, several assumptions about social tagging systems have emerged on which our community also builds their work. Yet, testing such assumptions has been difficult due to the absence of suitable usage data in the past. In this work, we investigate and evaluate four assumptions about tagging systems by examining live server log data gathered from the public social tagging system BibSonomy. Our empirical results indicate that while some of these assumptions hold to a certain extent, other assumptions need to be reflected in a very critical light.
@inproceedings{doerfel2014evaluating, abstract = {Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in today’s web and have attracted the interest of our research community in a variety of investigations. Henceforth, several assumptions about social tagging systems have emerged on which our community also builds their work. Yet, testing such assumptions has been difficult due to the absence of suitable usage data in the past. In this work, we investigate and evaluate four assumptions about tagging systems by examining live server log data gathered from the public social tagging system BibSonomy. Our empirical results indicate that while some of these assumptions hold to a certain extent, other assumptions need to be reflected in a very critical light.}, author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 16th LWA Workshops: KDML, IR and FGWM, Aachen, Germany, September 8-10, 2014.}, crossref = {DBLP:conf/lwa/2014}, editor = {Seidl, Thomas and Hassani, Marwan and Beecks, Christian}, keywords = {tagging myown social evaluation assumption}, pages = {18–19}, publisher = {CEUR-WS.org}, series = {{CEUR} Workshop Proceedings}, title = {Evaluating Assumptions about Social Tagging - {A} Study of User Behavior in BibSonomy}, volume = 1226, year = 2014 }

2.
Doerfel, S., Zoller, D., Singer, P., Niebler, T., Hotho, A., Strohmaier, M.: How Social is Social Tagging?. 23rd International World Wide Web Conference, WWW ’14, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 7-11, 2014, Companion Volume. pp. 251–252. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014).
[ Abstract ] [ BibTeX ] [ URL ] [ Download ]
 
Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in today’s web and have attracted the inter- est of our research community in a variety of investigations. This has led to several assumptions about tagging, such as that tagging systems exhibit a social component. In this work we overcome the previous absence of data for testing such an assumption. We thoroughly study social interac- tion, leveraging for the first time live log data gathered from the real-world public social tagging system BibSonomy. Our results indicate that sharing of resources constitutes an im- portant and indeed social aspect of tagging.
@inproceedings{doerfel2014social, abstract = {Social tagging systems have established themselves as an important part in today’s web and have attracted the inter- est of our research community in a variety of investigations. This has led to several assumptions about tagging, such as that tagging systems exhibit a social component. In this work we overcome the previous absence of data for testing such an assumption. We thoroughly study social interac- tion, leveraging for the first time live log data gathered from the real-world public social tagging system BibSonomy. Our results indicate that sharing of resources constitutes an im- portant and indeed social aspect of tagging.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Doerfel, Stephan and Zoller, Daniel and Singer, Philipp and Niebler, Thomas and Hotho, Andreas and Strohmaier, Markus}, booktitle = {23rd International World Wide Web Conference, {WWW} '14, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 7-11, 2014, Companion Volume}, keywords = {tagging sys:relevantfor:l3s myown log social for:dmir analysis user bibsonomy behavior selected}, pages = {251–252}, publisher = {ACM}, series = {WWW 2014}, title = {How Social is Social Tagging?}, year = 2014 }